Quote:
As for your historical quote I would like to counter by saying "History repeats itself." This is such a true statement. While it sounds like I am agreeing with you, I am not. If you look deeply into the meaning, I am saying that all of these changes will continue getting worse and worse repeating themselves.
|
What is so bad about Dinsey's history? Disney's history was probably even better than it is today. What do you mean by the changes getting worse? I think these changes keep getting better and better. So I hope with my heart that history repeats itself for Disney's sake!
Quote:
As for the chicken nugget thing, some people do come to the parks to eat their favorite foot their. If the only reason they went their was to eat their awesome chicken tenders they would kind of upset, dont you think?
|
What I'm trying to say is, if you go to Disney World just for the food and then find out your food was taken away, would you seriously cancel your whole trip to Disney World and fly back home without even going on one ride or even entering the park? One type of food in like five amusement parks is not the end of the Disney company. The point I'm trying to make is that the Disney theme parks are so big and so numerous, that there's bound to be one change you dislike, but even still, it doesn't totally stop you from going to the park altogether.
Quote:
Can you please answer my question this time? How come suddenly after several years of serving the chicken tenders they suddenly did cook all the way through? And if they were giving people food poisoning wouldn't it have been all over the news?
|
The health concern may not have been as drastic as to cause sickness. I mean, it could have been just like if you order a pink burger. Or, standards for health concern may have changed and Disney had to change it altogether. Another reason could be that the new chicken nuggets were all around better for you than the old chicken nuggets. For whatever reason, it was for the best of the customers.
[/quote]Oswald the luck rabbit was way cooler then mickey.[/quote]
You're joking, right? Have you ever heard the phrase, "It all started with a mouse?" The whole business was started and is mainly based upon Mickey Mouse (although I prefer Donald Duck). It's your personal opinion, but I mean, Mickey's been there from the start. Disney wouldn't be Disney without Mickey (or Donald Duck).
Quote:
I'm confused, didn't you just repeat the same thing over again?
|
I restated the same thing in a different way. But this is just another example of what irks me. In the rant section, it doesn't prove any point when you point out a contradiction or grammar mistake. For instance, if somone wanted to prove apples are better than oranges and a person says, "Apples are better. They are so much better than oranges," pointing out the repetition doesn't make anybody think oranges are any better than apples. It just doesn't have any way of making a point.